{"id":"W2756786004","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0185375","title":"How do environmental governance processes shape evaluation of outcomes by stakeholders? A causal pathways approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Brock University","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Corporate governance; Stakeholder; Stewardship (theology); Stakeholder engagement; Psychological intervention; Process (computing); Business; Environmental governance; Collaborative governance; Process management; Environmental resource management; Knowledge management; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04269331,0.001377357,0.00087601,0.003968472,0.00192387,0.007292936,0.00159867,0.001842609,0.01089234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1315456,0.0009073871,0.002322274,0.003847793,0.005401905,0.009065145,0.007122909,0.003097895,0.0004899484],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006258513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008478033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01681372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0120107,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9563938,0.03391993,0.001291118,0.003939428,0.002661164,0.001794598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8707847,0.09911076,0.01527703,0.00570507,0.006725585,0.00239682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001190809,0.001481764,0.670868,0.001667767,0.002299794,0.0008449399,0.04103815,0.01284303,0.001307274,0.1862154,0.001430371,0.07881264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003467267,0.001483087,0.3567317,0.001880049,0.002043828,0.000410297,0.04409095,0.05793618,0.002328651,0.5217312,0.01071987,0.0002974199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7756394,0.002150122,0.1617603,0.01226581,0.0002156381,0.003057798,0.001880614,0.0002329061,0.04279752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975248,0.0003474934,0.02199077,0.0002309289,0.00001221327,0.001068568,0.0001824538,0.00003606986,0.0008836],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04269331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2257864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.171168338774997,"score_gpt":0.2496301147401567,"score_spread":0.07846177596515974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}