{"id":"W2757362726","doi":"10.1093/gji/ggx407","title":"Constraining the magnitude of the largest event in a foreshock–main shock–aftershock sequence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysical Journal International","topic":"earthquake and tectonic studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Aftershock; Foreshock; Magnitude (astronomy); Seismology; Shock (circulatory); Sequence (biology); Geology; Event (particle physics); Maximum magnitude; Bayesian probability; Statistics; Induced seismicity; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000353995,0.00009160263,0.0001270614,0.00003160375,0.0004419125,0.0001384343,0.0009040107,0.00002648434,0.0003959433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000260844,0.00004776604,0.0001361367,0.00004707996,0.000334747,0.0001920323,0.00007574806,0.0003645708,0.0000272195],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000101848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008232113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008584937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003400111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989439,0.00006603183,0.0002458712,0.0001135448,0.0004279071,0.0002027029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992445,0.0001985109,0.0002433752,0.000194518,0.00007520914,0.00004395383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004103177,0.00003876684,0.9680418,0.000002864046,0.00006960732,0.00004579227,0.0003761228,0.000673087,0.00009135737,0.001126947,0.0002088725,0.02928378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003357007,0.00004700906,0.9915667,0.00006943333,0.000007987907,0.0001041226,0.0001809906,0.002742885,0.00007836842,0.003989517,0.0008153206,0.00006203467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865749,0.0000941654,0.00002582904,0.004842996,0.0007384969,0.00007306776,0.00005611804,0.000003308,0.007591079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991007,0.00004910385,0.00007094736,0.0002748653,0.00030741,0.000001055515,0.000002512607,0.000001830821,0.0001915486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02922174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4335301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03130009378519227,"score_gpt":0.2776527578722951,"score_spread":0.2463526640871028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}