{"id":"W2758103957","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2013-0002","title":"THE DYNAMIC ANALYSES AND VERIFICATIONS OF A HOLLOW SHAFT WITH HOT-FIT COMPONENT USING 3D FINITE CONTACT ELEMENT","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Finite element method; Rotor (electric); Modal; Contact mechanics; Modal analysis; Structural engineering; Component (thermodynamics); Stress (linguistics); Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Helicopter rotor; Materials science; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001753873,0.0001515873,0.0002047955,0.00006527337,0.0002918147,0.00004454352,0.0002480631,0.00008986789,0.00002399748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000313785,0.0001076312,0.0002278698,0.0003487359,0.00004724142,0.00008783553,0.000007510635,0.0002429266,5.638589e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001933819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009735683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003462828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004014079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999055,0.0000105988,0.0002957733,0.0001313583,0.0001847176,0.0003225164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990951,0.0002502675,0.00003453146,0.0003330217,0.00009612538,0.0001909047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004022946,0.00001170329,9.929339e-7,0.0001331151,0.0003254601,6.883342e-8,0.00007568709,0.9046162,0.09282735,0.001052884,0.00001912986,0.0009333467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002484147,0.00004849056,0.00008903544,0.00006487752,0.00009220689,0.00000264306,0.0001063246,0.9887871,0.0100826,0.00003257474,0.0003241348,0.00012164],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04797955,0.000251877,0.9505184,0.0002648492,0.0001188118,0.0006643404,0.0001321984,0.00005934449,0.0000106563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760051,0.00007734667,0.02370139,0.000009894432,0.000009540103,0.0001291203,0.000005019851,0.00003508367,0.00002748702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9280255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5234783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03140435816671193,"score_gpt":0.2658109605792556,"score_spread":0.2344066024125437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}