{"id":"W2758291878","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2017-0224","title":"Particle breakage in granular materials — a conceptual framework","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Breakage; Granular material; Fractal dimension; Geotechnical engineering; Fractal; Mechanics; Particle-size distribution; Statistical physics; Materials science; Mathematics; Geology; Particle size; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005042964,0.0001950307,0.0002994354,0.0001213879,0.0002863203,0.0003022763,0.000709235,0.0003988532,0.0002368483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005418172,0.000201417,0.00008119871,0.00009569206,0.0001134506,0.0001864903,0.00004336637,0.001052387,0.00008689134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002620894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001071737,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003233131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002175783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984784,0.00002780793,0.0003929018,0.0001660509,0.0001835403,0.0007513002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984821,0.00004210397,0.00005003376,0.0005862149,0.00003348684,0.0008060558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006035019,0.0001320461,0.0006858283,0.0001513148,0.0001639929,0.008076734,0.0008271479,0.7655485,0.03460424,0.1208391,0.005682982,0.06322777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005730493,0.0006130109,0.07603604,0.002458859,0.0001666493,0.003725697,0.000564982,0.6086857,0.04696611,0.1008573,0.1492071,0.004988029],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725208,0.0006071833,0.0225147,0.001514654,0.001717321,0.00021722,0.00004742951,0.0003683449,0.0004924082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989869,0.0001243845,0.0004306897,0.0001372363,0.0002332571,0.00001246473,0.000001759803,0.00004521752,0.00002807773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1568627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8213546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01215131699234616,"score_gpt":0.2139862353344406,"score_spread":0.2018349183420945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}