{"id":"W2759395049","doi":"10.1109/iros.2017.8206397","title":"A unified approach to configuration-based dynamic analysis of quadcopters for optimal stability","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Robotic Path Planning Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Quadcopter; Redundancy (engineering); Fuselage; Computer science; Control theory (sociology); Longitudinal static stability; Stability (learning theory); Wing; Aerospace engineering; Control engineering; Aerodynamics; Engineering; Control (management); Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005521523,0.001549504,0.0009876832,0.001474926,0.0006378894,0.001572006,0.001425031,0.001073604,0.005792934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001597041,0.0006309845,0.001597464,0.0008378816,0.00106288,0.001101249,0.002182457,0.00158223,0.001139333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008463968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008709457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003038105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002282318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997132,0.00008617942,0.00001638605,0.00005376609,0.00009121426,0.00003930855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996988,0.0001077622,0.00005321834,0.00003558923,0.00008025292,0.00002440739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001347288,0.00002149997,0.0002980614,0.00008812039,0.00003846627,0.00008689299,0.00006963826,0.8934879,0.001843674,0.09122053,0.001385264,0.01144645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002063707,0.00001308588,0.00006652832,0.00001800035,0.00000556997,0.00001650046,0.00001307526,0.9737516,0.0001393457,0.02467769,0.001289908,0.000006649605],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004432309,0.0006268823,0.982335,0.0001310089,0.00005580082,0.0000587965,0.00007496808,0.0000916014,0.01219376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7418716,0.003347332,0.2363019,0.000353869,0.000353487,0.001052893,0.0006038267,0.0005906057,0.01552446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005792934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01937932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06090189287633928,"score_gpt":0.3198829712998394,"score_spread":0.2589810784235001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}