{"id":"W2759395049","doi":"10.1109/iros.2017.8206397","title":"A unified approach to configuration-based dynamic analysis of quadcopters for optimal stability","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Robotic Path Planning Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Quadcopter; Redundancy (engineering); Fuselage; Computer science; Control theory (sociology); Longitudinal static stability; Stability (learning theory); Wing; Aerospace engineering; Control engineering; Aerodynamics; Engineering; Control (management); Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00114335,0.0003233607,0.0009110182,0.0006191881,0.0001333802,0.0003020805,0.002668492,0.0002494544,0.000008153053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003293831,0.0003054712,0.0004651922,0.000426736,0.00009218326,0.0001160454,0.0005117709,0.0002347117,0.000003439531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001607318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006264026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004444958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001866506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973075,0.0001183067,0.0006189948,0.001166824,0.0004499043,0.0003384346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953694,0.0003823765,0.0005784269,0.0030174,0.0004812708,0.0001711445],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002389582,0.0001470278,0.0002483244,0.0001551632,0.0006039472,9.104102e-7,0.0007184593,0.9947838,0.0001401022,0.001400249,0.00005325095,0.001724875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002500478,0.00006555882,0.00475935,0.00002957011,0.0003436606,1.914455e-7,0.00004526063,0.9932836,0.0007416666,0.0001492136,0.00001096903,0.0003209],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.005738915,0.00001100233,0.9895188,0.000473975,0.000348882,0.001178884,0.000165402,0.0001557893,0.002408416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4197321,2.410397e-7,0.5797356,0.00004971675,0.000008698713,0.00014595,0.0002227706,0.000007676234,0.00009719512],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4139932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999397,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06090189287633928,"score_gpt":0.3198829712998394,"score_spread":0.2589810784235001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}