{"id":"W2760246646","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.310","title":"Spoken syntax in a comparative perspective: The dative and genitive alternation in varieties of English","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Linguistic Variation and Morphology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Vlaamse regering; Universitetet i Oslo; KU Leuven; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; University of Cambridge; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Genitive case; Dative case; Linguistics; Varieties of English; Variation (astronomy); Syntax; British English; Computer science; Perspective (graphical); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Noun","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001247896,0.00007973472,0.0002599658,0.0001186927,0.0002672286,0.00008169188,0.0003014747,0.00006591136,0.00001789972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03212366,0.00006266134,0.00003836581,0.00007685123,0.0005585332,0.00005900376,0.00006024937,0.0002483025,4.896142e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001471331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003012203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005182729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005022174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998823,0.0002930158,0.0003761391,0.0001012397,0.0002613042,0.0001452865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961994,0.0003234181,0.0007067327,0.0001091133,0.002616915,0.00004436683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001485628,0.00009556975,0.03039023,0.000005632854,0.00005403854,0.00005977256,0.2482326,0.0001222119,0.00004986077,0.7204487,0.0001946195,0.0001981764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006005826,0.0007278768,0.487045,0.0003352143,0.0002297857,0.00002271695,0.2054396,0.002083419,0.001338975,0.2356524,0.06049567,0.0006234416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8657098,0.0004843218,0.0004363398,0.0007168596,0.003487706,0.0002786242,0.00004316546,0.000005043832,0.1288382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961904,0.0002186367,0.001369365,0.00006432889,0.00200456,0.000001582876,9.587368e-7,0.000003677071,0.0001465017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4847963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9760292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04629494444331173,"score_gpt":0.3802781662875881,"score_spread":0.3339832218442764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}