{"id":"W2760405437","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2017.07.297","title":"NEW APPROACH TO OLD CONCEPTS: PROGNOSIS AND NATURAL HISTORY OF CONDUCTION SYSTEM DISEASE; PROGNOSTIC IMPLICATIONS OF CONDUCTION SYSTEM DISEASE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Ejection fraction; Cardiology; Internal medicine; Left bundle branch block; Coronary artery disease; Proportional hazards model; Cohort; Retrospective cohort study; Intraventricular conduction; Electrocardiography; Electrical conduction system of the heart; Hazard ratio; Heart failure; Confidence interval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01072087,0.001339,0.002228984,0.004880799,0.001159262,0.006491187,0.003640822,0.004043892,0.00246424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02378649,0.000437042,0.000938623,0.002475724,0.01078871,0.01523308,0.002599519,0.00823151,0.000700409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003401752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00271883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00614776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007013977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975084,0.0009186502,0.000375076,0.0005725117,0.0005111537,0.0001142107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792436,0.01208324,0.001347014,0.0016073,0.003979039,0.001739844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001144013,0.0008842702,0.2462973,0.002089066,0.001083596,0.003413881,0.004649512,0.00420866,0.004898262,0.2403836,0.07102239,0.4199255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000172037,0.0007364649,0.08252823,0.002124357,0.0004902168,0.008637979,0.004870915,0.01400983,0.0006141004,0.786661,0.09872322,0.0004316579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07097228,0.4856505,0.08508937,0.3244492,0.01590316,0.00009314706,0.001421673,0.0003290556,0.0160916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6261709,0.1842401,0.04606237,0.04009697,0.09803002,0.0001462817,0.000762222,0.0001853231,0.004305879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01072087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05669802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02258678130367804,"score_gpt":0.2563281125709931,"score_spread":0.2337413312673151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}