{"id":"W2760835709","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2017.08.005","title":"Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Electronic Learning Tool for Volumetric Imaging Training—Perceptions of Radiation Therapy Professionals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences","topic":"Radiology practices and education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Radiation Therapist; Medical physics; Cone beam computed tomography; Image-guided radiation therapy; Medicine; Perception; Resource (disambiguation); Medical education; Radiation therapy; Psychology; Computed tomography; Computer science; Radiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01314276,0.0003486217,0.0004132308,0.0009084083,0.001409001,0.00325341,0.0007289289,0.001400358,0.003785896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05420545,0.0005108955,0.0008273579,0.0003531183,0.001288908,0.001854909,0.002365198,0.00169501,0.0005622437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001690169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00247807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003083182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003323731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933817,0.002849288,0.0006232988,0.0004310343,0.001735409,0.0009792849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9502292,0.02606332,0.007663208,0.001152961,0.006848689,0.008042592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001798587,0.01385801,0.7124829,0.0006360484,0.0002883137,0.0008938424,0.1881387,0.0006642168,0.005885415,0.0005833102,0.002403553,0.07236718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003360754,0.0108061,0.6562201,0.000480052,0.0002017539,0.0008978976,0.3176905,0.002401255,0.003096642,0.0004772133,0.007210618,0.0001818647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980218,0.00006646748,0.0001461139,0.0003238874,0.00001757235,0.0000570596,0.00001383115,0.000006314172,0.001346848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998332,0.000117079,0.0004604746,0.0003112315,0.00001394573,0.00004154635,0.00002259799,0.000005202621,0.0006960236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01314276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06950641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06979963578182545,"score_gpt":0.493377716010588,"score_spread":0.4235780802287625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}