{"id":"W2761511038","doi":"10.2495/sdp-v13-n2-197-207","title":"Comparative sustainability assessment using three rating systems in the Myanmar context","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Context (archaeology); Rating system; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Environmental economics; Geography; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006796917,0.0004378051,0.0003502418,0.004214233,0.001443746,0.002637223,0.0006400409,0.000359471,0.002012545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01008057,0.0002029465,0.0004967433,0.003986178,0.001176806,0.002394238,0.002610946,0.0005032499,0.0001405172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002902048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00159567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009828594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02006404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952167,0.003415551,0.0002814151,0.0002824631,0.0005626608,0.0002411178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961262,0.001504342,0.0006774694,0.000400114,0.001171552,0.0001203452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007511562,0.0006088358,0.4406996,0.001638866,0.0003732338,0.002436658,0.06574844,0.01841579,0.01118889,0.05812527,0.003308282,0.396705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006218495,0.001844927,0.6688775,0.001073283,0.0004603495,0.001520477,0.2046154,0.03114414,0.01092012,0.01864268,0.06058802,0.0002508787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9609482,0.0005213502,0.01046192,0.0002726026,0.00002558115,0.0003544865,0.0002491269,0.00003696738,0.02712986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811639,0.000403039,0.01704273,0.00001737397,0.000005570074,0.000200267,0.0001435049,0.000007344831,0.001016257],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009828594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03594595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03532099203267602,"score_gpt":0.3412416141823544,"score_spread":0.3059206221496784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}