{"id":"W2761793470","doi":"10.24870/cjb.2017-a29","title":"Is ecological source important in phylogenomics analysis: a pilot study involving 17 Drosophila species using multilocus approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Biotechnology","topic":"Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phylogenomics; Drosophila (subgenus); Biology; Evolutionary biology; Ecology; Computational biology; Phylogenetics; Genetics; Clade; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000478212,0.0002212333,0.0005185636,0.0005586799,0.0003944827,0.00008448108,0.0008417389,0.000270903,0.00001060089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002203356,0.0002057932,0.0001618426,0.0001807163,0.0004391139,0.000002695153,0.0001895106,0.0003198795,6.036305e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001022673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000406487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004946806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07189346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984532,0.00005342904,0.0005862141,0.0003663622,0.00008632719,0.00045444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984281,0.000009829615,0.0006032553,0.0006495824,0.000103481,0.0002057329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006359112,0.0002604921,0.6790686,0.000005960397,0.00103796,0.000170355,0.0004625102,0.001111693,0.3172756,0.00006836149,0.0000956691,0.0003792168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002420383,0.004476976,0.9554384,0.00001872138,0.0006946463,0.0002940132,0.005383471,0.001868387,0.02292291,0.0004429604,0.005282557,0.0007565297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958342,0.003076349,0.0002096316,0.000415492,0.0001437831,0.0001934994,0.00002780308,0.000001697692,0.00009752899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982195,0.0003555119,0.00105798,0.0001294074,0.0001567588,0.000003725464,0.000002671477,0.00001852239,0.00005591035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2943527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9450421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0454415497708005,"score_gpt":0.2575427688967294,"score_spread":0.2121012191259289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}