{"id":"W2761844773","doi":"10.1007/jhep01(2018)089","title":"Electroweak baryogenesis and the standard model effective field theory","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of High Energy Physics","topic":"Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"TRIUMF","funders":"Lorentz Center; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Baryogenesis; Electroweak interaction; Effective field theory; Standard Model (mathematical formulation); Higgs boson; Effective action; Field (mathematics); Thermal quantum field theory","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001934687,0.0001253094,0.0002684531,0.00001123776,0.0001961115,0.00003115582,0.0001271254,0.0000157081,0.00002551714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007859512,0.00007170175,0.0001301536,0.00008381983,0.0004209067,0.0001141263,0.00007999829,0.0001023158,0.000002411942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000145374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002098122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002986658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.947216e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992858,0.0001010621,0.0001811532,0.00009403613,0.0001640345,0.0001738877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992607,0.0003053691,0.0001392263,0.000106045,0.0001290194,0.00005962908],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009357643,0.00005600878,0.000219244,0.000001260469,0.0002570614,3.976353e-7,0.0003175603,0.0000954128,0.001808332,0.9650816,0.0002441163,0.03098318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007081294,0.0002157358,0.00001782532,0.000007131915,0.00005552472,7.727442e-7,0.00007953995,0.0005904985,0.3649926,0.6331993,0.00007347725,0.00005948004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4140692,0.0002765687,0.5802461,0.0004458454,0.0001019191,0.0000441167,0.000005637488,0.000005383082,0.004805205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983017,0.0000235118,0.000496264,0.0001790122,0.0009414272,0.000009307668,4.980609e-7,0.00001099319,0.0000372276],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5842325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2923913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0038046172256347,"score_gpt":0.2265833498218221,"score_spread":0.2227787325961874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}