{"id":"W2763175966","doi":"10.1007/s11625-017-0495-4","title":"Multiple factors that shaped sustainability science journal: a 10-year review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Sustainability Science","topic":"Sustainability in Higher Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Institute for Water Security; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Oxford; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Sustainability science; Sustainability; Discipline; Transdisciplinarity; Engineering ethics; Milestone; Scope (computer science); Publishing; Representativeness heuristic; Diversity (politics); Political science; Sociology; Social science; Sustainability organizations; Engineering; Geography; Ecology; Psychology; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06314337,0.001459828,0.003724963,0.002087187,0.01789406,0.004918167,0.01575808,0.0007646586,0.0009243889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2894352,0.001236177,0.001677938,0.00943123,0.04548594,0.007266849,0.002419655,0.002083996,0.00007547854],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05433544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1846573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003529086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004717361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9792346,0.002674185,0.002411674,0.003973121,0.006882596,0.004823787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9589882,0.003035081,0.003662672,0.007158764,0.02438822,0.002767018],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002525988,0.0008670813,0.01494377,0.1097172,0.00006011113,0.00005839158,0.01776271,0.000002218385,1.623415e-7,0.007536174,0.002503728,0.8465232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001664664,0.00009939241,0.001510853,0.005143454,0.0004062556,0.00001992307,0.03312168,0.000003315395,7.835243e-7,0.01235381,0.9459212,0.001252841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009042054,0.9738771,0.00003206453,0.004791859,0.00312558,0.01326301,0.00003412418,0.0004065472,0.003565527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01426044,0.9782263,0.0002023937,0.00009877265,0.0005556126,0.0006977299,0.00001969536,0.0001001669,0.005838894],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9434175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.144566519250358,"score_gpt":0.4937007345017629,"score_spread":0.3491342152514049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}