{"id":"W2763424675","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2017.09.010","title":"Assessing audit impact and thoroughness of VCS forest carbon offset projects","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Policy","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Rainforest Alliance","keywords":"Carbon offset; Audit; Offset (computer science); Business; Accounting; Carbon stock; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Computer science; Greenhouse gas; Climate change; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02038329,0.0003589302,0.0004915117,0.003435989,0.00078281,0.002532694,0.0008640399,0.001419969,0.002135733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1538378,0.0004324101,0.0005320929,0.003129705,0.0008333887,0.002543073,0.001498212,0.001162708,0.0002271401],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006181332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01158134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04224419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06867264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9813201,0.005741013,0.001580643,0.0009676702,0.007772088,0.00261839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7180226,0.1447399,0.07507236,0.009913427,0.0436065,0.008645189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00185178,0.0008600886,0.9169509,0.0001207046,0.0002051064,0.0001555013,0.0005064505,0.02884818,0.0007657608,0.001681904,0.001683616,0.04636998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001074367,0.001641152,0.9592655,0.0001058441,0.0001724548,0.00009719928,0.001525896,0.03181283,0.001750287,0.001555939,0.001918756,0.00004660338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956268,0.00007165965,0.0004478492,0.0002810787,0.00001087607,0.0001057273,0.0004503759,0.00003340323,0.002972185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985284,0.00004174844,0.0005764207,0.00003332221,0.000005691175,0.00002711765,0.0002598404,0.000003265983,0.0005242082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04224419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1077985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01843602112738846,"score_gpt":0.3156507695966648,"score_spread":0.2972147484692763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}