{"id":"W2763787095","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0195145","title":"Conditional equivalence testing: An alternative remedy for publication bias","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Publication bias; Computer science; Bayesian probability; Statistical hypothesis testing; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Discrete mathematics; Confidence interval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2964083,0.001716843,0.003062217,0.004898063,0.002542816,0.005986345,0.008359999,0.00838914,0.01776689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6484741,0.001176252,0.003971627,0.006913623,0.01153857,0.01422012,0.009893433,0.01064578,0.002470268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002878444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01213666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001619091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001071204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5839974,0.348861,0.01811255,0.01714084,0.02899867,0.002889489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3229697,0.5667225,0.02128978,0.06915567,0.01754826,0.00231411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007361599,0.00008844771,0.002534548,0.000886596,0.0008142137,0.0002476632,0.0009500902,0.005463115,0.0004522931,0.7958842,0.006903954,0.1850387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005105923,0.0004194826,0.0006945141,0.0005050619,0.000316311,0.0003344821,0.00008484573,0.02280092,0.001433322,0.9529425,0.01986968,0.00008827314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002149495,0.000656971,0.9815263,0.009915676,0.0008647745,0.0004475321,0.0002665994,0.0004012591,0.003771582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1779656,0.0008835219,0.8009014,0.0106803,0.002227061,0.003037136,0.0002853378,0.0004660882,0.003553495],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7035917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8676538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9344245942914531,"score_gpt":0.5979018871787765,"score_spread":0.3365227071126766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}