{"id":"W2763867052","doi":"10.1139/cjc-2017-0239","title":"Carbon dot doped silica nanoparticles as fluorescent probe for determination of bromate in drinking water samples","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Chemistry","topic":"Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Science and Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province; Henan University; Henan University of Technology; National Natural Science Foundation of China; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Bromate; Chemistry; Detection limit; Nanoparticle; Pyrolysis; Fluorescence; Linear range; Carbon fibers; Inorganic chemistry; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Nuclear chemistry; Chromatography; Nanotechnology; Materials science; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003099584,0.00007631547,0.0001678149,0.00004497512,0.0001180884,0.0001004378,0.0003302012,0.00005253213,0.00008300581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000159898,0.00006286135,0.00005195319,0.00002071159,0.0001165603,0.00009191327,0.00001815608,0.00006059043,0.000001523665],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009260434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003100309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003545024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008238192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992048,0.000009888639,0.0003439459,0.0001070058,0.0001070376,0.0002273209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991364,0.00002420899,0.0002708267,0.0002395956,0.0001326857,0.0001963145],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001687387,0.00001148646,0.002131992,0.00005452929,0.000002098253,0.0000100246,0.0003741513,0.00000414236,0.9967787,0.00005529806,0.00001269249,0.000547965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003747276,0.0000193471,0.00378349,0.0001073101,0.00001066398,0.00003744183,0.00007053739,0.0001085542,0.9938191,0.001127676,0.000463146,0.00007807645],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998861,0.00004888632,0.00001972649,0.0004877316,0.00008157849,0.0001087759,0.00001149066,0.000002903564,0.0003778684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993558,0.000004025076,0.0004795903,0.0000172941,0.00007198119,0.00001186215,0.00000222975,0.000009182509,0.00004802355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004693168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5359039,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02105092845721624,"score_gpt":0.2608802230471264,"score_spread":0.2398292945899101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}