{"id":"W2765104676","doi":"10.1525/ca.2017.36.2.288","title":"Take-Away Art: Ekphrasis and Appropriation in Martial's Apophoreta 170–82","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Classical Antiquity","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Poetics; Martial arts; Banquet; Literature; Cultural appropriation; Art; Section (typography); Capital (architecture); Poetry; Power (physics); History; Art history; Visual arts; Aesthetics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001132263,0.0002145124,0.0004468473,0.00007603437,0.001682247,0.0004487631,0.0005335952,0.0002662214,0.0001856723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002376228,0.0001904952,0.0001162867,0.0001739162,0.002158101,0.0005083036,0.0005198664,0.0003962671,0.000117611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001233664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001138123,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004616278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02088486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976475,0.000248048,0.0003532156,0.0005707613,0.0005570872,0.0006234189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987192,0.0002329978,0.0002258613,0.000476642,0.00009181954,0.0002535097],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002618268,0.001218316,0.3235828,0.0001532384,0.0001104955,0.0001137956,0.009265224,0.000002142021,0.002236712,0.2834312,0.0586557,0.3209686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007359462,0.00008572658,0.5308067,0.00007434494,0.00003778709,0.000001355634,0.0007241349,0.0009055304,0.0003206544,0.01394443,0.4519213,0.0004420876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7579373,0.000124424,0.0003534959,0.1386119,0.0008767655,0.0006078545,0.00002039559,0.0001617162,0.1013063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801789,0.0003912733,0.0001894659,0.0002370239,0.0005441863,0.00002441799,0.000004103934,0.00001441423,0.01841624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3932656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04223446223558255,"score_gpt":0.3390951728987984,"score_spread":0.2968607106632159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}