{"id":"W2765290224","doi":"10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.10.051","title":"Resonant polymer ablation using a compact 3.44 μm fiber laser","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Materials Processing Technology","topic":"Laser Material Processing Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Laserax (Canada); Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Materials science; Polymer; Laser; Ablation; Laser ablation; Fiber; Fiber laser; Polypropylene; Polyethylene; Wavelength; Composite material; Optics; Optoelectronics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000247396,0.000254994,0.0004872785,0.0002481745,0.0004410477,0.0003791145,0.0005405881,0.0004656212,0.001712986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001994112,0.0003065612,0.0003051822,0.0001797253,0.0003922737,0.0007407026,0.0004296981,0.0003486463,0.0004917136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004940943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006569806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001574277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997414,0.000009073525,0.000009487893,0.0000973018,0.00009736444,0.00004532646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997452,0.00008021073,0.00007402775,0.00003937577,0.00003228015,0.00002890308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007364312,0.00001897431,0.0001558946,0.0000259491,0.000003014787,0.00003446482,0.00002613545,0.0001591526,0.9947007,0.0002393389,0.00008269605,0.004480035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003130881,0.0002754415,0.002863858,0.000006321656,0.00001917369,0.0004134127,0.00003200976,0.006734671,0.9865601,0.0001121669,0.002928552,0.00002311759],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9514794,0.000999561,0.0403676,0.0002324213,0.00005212244,0.00005183953,0.000077726,0.0007054739,0.006033755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656011,0.0002398235,0.02982823,0.00004593488,0.00003636098,0.00002055048,0.0000439473,0.00006658356,0.004117382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001712986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00573051,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02239229792593095,"score_gpt":0.2823846956849179,"score_spread":0.2599923977589869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}