{"id":"W2765290224","doi":"10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.10.051","title":"Resonant polymer ablation using a compact 3.44 μm fiber laser","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Materials Processing Technology","topic":"Laser Material Processing Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Laserax (Canada); Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Materials science; Polymer; Laser; Ablation; Laser ablation; Fiber; Fiber laser; Polypropylene; Polyethylene; Wavelength; Composite material; Optics; Optoelectronics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006911179,0.0002653435,0.0005693827,0.0004561953,0.0003615102,0.0005821165,0.0008146337,0.0003672583,0.0001216914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001953823,0.0002248176,0.00005652393,0.0001230244,0.0002258645,0.0009609606,0.0001158775,0.0002538416,0.00001482784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001762808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001227524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001882843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001625515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983518,0.00003178459,0.0007746816,0.0001684729,0.000304649,0.0003685782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982238,0.00001290628,0.0009383097,0.0004607271,0.0002977357,0.00006646766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007924949,0.00003182346,0.0001152103,0.0002677883,0.00003962014,0.00006312146,0.0000518425,0.0001317844,0.9862056,0.00004703471,0.0008229726,0.01214399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004207516,0.00007473123,0.0002935211,0.0007340436,0.00005822093,0.0004471215,0.00001757289,0.0006893478,0.9907528,0.004114638,0.002138788,0.0002584736],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953844,0.0006673827,0.001616751,0.000535375,0.0007681777,0.00009732876,0.00001104419,0.0005615431,0.0003579798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888769,0.00004761884,0.01055364,0.00002282817,0.0003564485,0.000002618315,0.000001327239,0.00007960961,0.00005899967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01188551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9167796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02239229792593095,"score_gpt":0.2823846956849179,"score_spread":0.2599923977589869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}