{"id":"W2765415862","doi":"10.1111/anti.12372","title":"Environmental Justice Meets Risk‐Class: The Relational Distribution of Environmental<i>Bads</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Antipode","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Injustice; Environmental justice; Inequality; Distribution (mathematics); Sociology; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Class (philosophy); Environmental ethics; Environmental studies; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005841068,0.0001157954,0.0001378021,0.00001314684,0.003473934,0.00005605472,0.0004258925,0.0001084882,0.00035642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001385858,0.00009823011,0.00008212868,0.0000195439,0.001565834,0.0004049682,0.0001358242,0.0001990455,0.0001691182],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001474834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003855665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007677069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004549061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985373,0.0001659447,0.0002524852,0.0002048408,0.0005229214,0.0003164992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988897,0.0002146179,0.0003795473,0.0004165202,0.00000321892,0.00009641557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001212087,0.0006897303,0.8134478,0.0001599131,0.0001086195,0.00001095541,0.01102961,0.0001085485,0.003201952,0.1509098,0.007494607,0.01271728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002641228,0.0000312573,0.9014299,0.00003260366,0.0001901491,0.00000116348,0.00737107,0.00005398279,0.0003693368,0.0006564233,0.08947223,0.0001277542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.979791,0.001223124,0.000136161,0.003701815,0.0003962911,0.0002850686,0.0007774197,0.00001949612,0.01366958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849434,0.01355249,0.00009089333,0.0002718925,0.0002608464,0.00001116074,0.00008164471,0.00001019281,0.0007774788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1502534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02128634782794656,"score_gpt":0.2865885042418486,"score_spread":0.265302156413902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}