{"id":"W2765551136","doi":"10.1109/tccn.2017.2769121","title":"Stackelberg Equilibria of an Anti-Jamming Game in Cooperative Cognitive Radio Networks","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking","topic":"Cognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Stackelberg competition; Cognitive radio; Jamming; Computer science; Game theory; Deception; Computer security; Strategy; Backward induction; Computer network; Wireless; Channel (broadcasting); Set (abstract data type); Telecommunications; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006843316,0.0003439565,0.0005360247,0.0002923068,0.001459722,0.0004978322,0.001111162,0.0001609284,0.00001000888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000304167,0.0003711809,0.0001203253,0.000480993,0.0007497362,0.001258541,0.00007535482,0.0008016029,0.000002732844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000595894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009143762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001763759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001381559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974951,0.0005575033,0.0005583115,0.0006397238,0.0002275771,0.0005218136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960729,0.001628979,0.0004118172,0.001329202,0.0003840794,0.0001730389],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001451796,0.0005394142,0.0009015953,0.00001481291,0.0001822149,0.00003372512,0.002078841,0.002557541,0.0002638985,0.00106653,0.000003760834,0.9922125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00213416,0.0005023965,0.007269488,0.001706664,0.00009655848,0.00004949269,0.0007475321,0.985231,0.00122797,0.0003679823,0.0001065613,0.0005601456],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2037514,0.001376784,0.7917116,0.0002183887,0.0003924294,0.0005030443,0.00002404646,0.0000746751,0.001947651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918144,0.005978147,0.001813955,0.0001427826,0.0001197656,0.00004797482,0.00001474808,0.00003453781,0.00003365252],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04071875252153063,"score_gpt":0.3034718984963976,"score_spread":0.2627531459748669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}