{"id":"W2765651214","doi":"10.1086/697735","title":"Taking Reductionism to the Limit: How to Rebut the Antireductionist Argument from Infinite Limits","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Guelph; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Universality (dynamical systems); Reductionism; Counterfactual thinking; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Limit (mathematics); Renormalization group; Philosophy; Incompatibilism; Compatibilism; Theoretical physics; Mathematics; Physics; Determinism; Mathematical physics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008800832,0.0001804599,0.0001711686,0.0002308832,0.005626751,0.0006481017,0.001764478,0.00002351498,0.0002358356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002749156,0.0001130587,0.00008071728,0.0005954744,0.01062906,0.0007844296,0.0002185026,0.000166945,0.0003209097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008808477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001451963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003869016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001933353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977896,0.00004224639,0.0002657019,0.0005752461,0.0009343104,0.0003929028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982683,0.00007340944,0.0002457193,0.0007364602,0.0004883328,0.0001877942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000585145,0.000127875,0.00003678462,0.000009640768,0.00002176788,0.000001452443,0.1247474,0.00006783703,0.03386285,0.8192816,0.008733854,0.01305043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001875463,0.0009648368,0.003667347,0.0001857413,0.00004327251,0.00001103583,0.006187963,0.0001234103,0.02121975,0.1510913,0.8157879,0.000529902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3661129,0.0001692109,0.0001162955,0.3205778,0.008062994,0.000662996,0.00007718731,0.0001025334,0.3041181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990012,0.000009634367,0.0005007624,0.003185973,0.00513176,0.00002811798,9.613822e-7,0.000009977447,0.001120806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.807054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956678,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09417133396671801,"score_gpt":0.2665429018246017,"score_spread":0.1723715678578837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}