{"id":"W2765651214","doi":"10.1086/697735","title":"Taking Reductionism to the Limit: How to Rebut the Antireductionist Argument from Infinite Limits","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Guelph; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Universality (dynamical systems); Reductionism; Counterfactual thinking; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Limit (mathematics); Renormalization group; Philosophy; Incompatibilism; Compatibilism; Theoretical physics; Mathematics; Physics; Determinism; Mathematical physics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006739143,0.0008472815,0.001672722,0.00159398,0.002854101,0.004484094,0.002692385,0.004902843,0.004687336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01711569,0.0004301631,0.001424233,0.0008107932,0.02266703,0.02256176,0.006726738,0.01269389,0.001642279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002099687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001965854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00178833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001295543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966449,0.001630225,0.0001155242,0.0004193847,0.0009374007,0.0002525991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921246,0.005051135,0.0002844665,0.001546227,0.0006875395,0.0003060639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008652401,0.00000893067,0.00004717863,0.00003026599,0.00001183717,0.00005129892,0.0003457739,0.0004392831,0.00008987234,0.993958,0.001714329,0.003294623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002286331,0.000001738112,0.000008741306,0.000009696482,0.000001488723,0.000009111095,0.00003864183,0.0003083418,0.00003944935,0.9971655,0.002411477,0.000003442089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04610178,0.01553808,0.3549412,0.3777224,0.009517413,0.00005311425,0.00008833143,0.001137935,0.1948998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8733288,0.007327429,0.05651899,0.02901215,0.005411323,0.0001871438,0.00011655,0.001431875,0.0266656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03564042,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09417133396671801,"score_gpt":0.2665429018246017,"score_spread":0.1723715678578837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}