{"id":"W2765669570","doi":"10.1080/00958964.2017.1364215","title":"Reimagining intersectionality in environmental and sustainability education: A critical literature review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Environmental Education","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Oppression; Sociology; Gender studies; Indigenous; Human sexuality; Black feminism; Race (biology); Sustainability; Interconnectivity; Feminism; Social science; Politics; Political science; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001569617,0.000210265,0.0002410514,0.00007271342,0.0004883002,0.00009151382,0.0005192558,0.00007259905,0.001882862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006292179,0.0001486061,0.00009295015,0.00007781192,0.001294655,0.001135619,0.0003271183,0.0005797957,0.00003231912],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001630387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001958021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001004072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001576329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981126,0.0003603353,0.0005933699,0.00027781,0.0004179486,0.0002379967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985131,0.0001335809,0.0004705719,0.0006778719,0.00001082755,0.0001940405],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001195716,0.002689842,0.8273389,0.0003570687,0.00001578632,0.000006283788,0.004011556,0.00001767105,0.001161022,0.0001647218,0.003756064,0.1603615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000210263,0.0000907361,0.9699821,0.0004591202,0.00005474779,0.0004057063,0.007028389,0.00001146854,0.00006018993,0.006579343,0.01493755,0.0001804053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9596978,0.01436622,0.00002843998,0.02279411,0.0007266073,0.0005546269,0.000008793116,0.000004855479,0.001818506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849113,0.01228651,0.0002906219,0.001609828,0.0001335556,0.00002753978,0.00000835862,0.00001442479,0.0007179156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1601811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005664808417589189,"score_gpt":0.3053908935029888,"score_spread":0.2997260850853996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}