{"id":"W2765808822","doi":"10.47339/ephj.2016.105","title":"Evaluation of the general public’s knowledge on ingredients in personal care products","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BCIT Environmental Public Health Journal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"British Columbia Institute of Technology","keywords":"Null hypothesis; Test (biology); Public health; Government (linguistics); Environmental health; Personal care; Health care; Legislation; Medicine; General knowledge; Purchasing; Business; Psychology; Family medicine; Nursing; Marketing; Political science; Social psychology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00328038,0.0002514062,0.000251948,0.0001059874,0.0004592935,0.00005084794,0.0004998766,0.000103465,0.002567709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002057956,0.0001539345,0.0001270284,0.0002879418,0.0004499235,0.0007514936,0.0003567124,0.0003604003,0.0002119678],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007905462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003584146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007164692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001230197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948068,0.001130594,0.0006083681,0.0004042552,0.002268391,0.0007816511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987616,0.00003926865,0.0004528695,0.0002943451,0.00001544523,0.0004364644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001543505,0.001071818,0.6289521,0.00001231563,0.00003060813,0.000002008996,0.004952191,0.00004487506,0.005460517,0.00003193604,0.002051295,0.3573749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002037448,0.0002497154,0.9830636,0.00006337956,0.00001260349,0.00002521805,0.001521362,0.0001107599,0.0004287371,0.0001465943,0.01213782,0.0002027614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866438,0.0002638457,0.00001388325,0.007370409,0.000607835,0.0005995203,0.00004374612,0.000008388163,0.00444861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984554,0.0001639888,0.00007897524,0.0005913305,0.0001924278,0.00002821451,0.00000780167,0.00002723868,0.0004546394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3571721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0743070139986301,"score_gpt":0.3396005874847511,"score_spread":0.265293573486121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}