{"id":"W2765808822","doi":"10.47339/ephj.2016.105","title":"Evaluation of the general public’s knowledge on ingredients in personal care products","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BCIT Environmental Public Health Journal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"British Columbia Institute of Technology","keywords":"Null hypothesis; Test (biology); Public health; Government (linguistics); Environmental health; Personal care; Health care; Legislation; Medicine; General knowledge; Purchasing; Business; Psychology; Family medicine; Nursing; Marketing; Political science; Social psychology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00315727,0.000208584,0.0002517195,0.001146742,0.0006139228,0.0006635231,0.0005107099,0.0004250835,0.003241309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007290913,0.0001213782,0.0004370425,0.00102302,0.0007354691,0.0004271356,0.0005797211,0.0005009797,0.0002930581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004074342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004287717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4121081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3421246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977266,0.0002666474,0.0001315488,0.000107096,0.00142912,0.0003389846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940559,0.001235297,0.001155877,0.0001373471,0.00275559,0.0006599681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002613957,0.0004518369,0.9692512,0.000181135,0.00004778085,0.00009900941,0.002644201,0.0001362789,0.0006195863,0.00004749083,0.0007515338,0.02550864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001418866,0.0005258938,0.9946929,0.00004285478,0.00003075449,0.00005842608,0.003024931,0.0002072348,0.000309659,0.00001558654,0.001069965,0.000007794483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957652,0.0001394529,0.0000601312,0.0001097783,0.000003658227,0.00006482453,0.0001589669,0.000005680571,0.003692145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988701,0.0001718665,0.00008985033,0.00004505674,0.000003867171,0.00001462814,0.000189892,6.927242e-7,0.0006141825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4121081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8194187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0743070139986301,"score_gpt":0.3396005874847511,"score_spread":0.265293573486121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}