{"id":"W2765895197","doi":"10.1149/2.1641713jes","title":"Editors' Choice—Electrolyte Film Thickness Effects on the Cathodic Current Availability in a Galvanic Couple","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of The Electrochemical Society","topic":"Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office of Naval Research; McMaster University","keywords":"Cathodic protection; Electrolyte; Cathode; Galvanic cell; Ohmic contact; Materials science; Current (fluid); Electrochemistry; Current density; Electrode; Chemistry; Composite material; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Layer (electronics); Thermodynamics; Metallurgy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002052456,0.0003605412,0.0003677038,0.0003985095,0.0003326503,0.001552752,0.0009309466,0.0006411059,0.01108845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00649916,0.0002406039,0.0003401521,0.0002874131,0.0002192565,0.001178916,0.0002835307,0.0004662295,0.003780503],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003895563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002868596,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002176425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004133218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991149,0.0001711811,0.00006423684,0.000193243,0.0004142499,0.00004213828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997024,0.001622093,0.000175366,0.0002746394,0.0008156323,0.00008835719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003431282,0.000310402,0.006087455,0.002315893,0.0001413402,0.001543097,0.0007923928,0.0184483,0.4633641,0.03303361,0.1119483,0.3585838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001614188,0.000987263,0.004736228,0.0001866972,0.0001748372,0.0007860296,0.0002222652,0.06882949,0.3990881,0.006129822,0.5185969,0.0001010436],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5390822,0.02471183,0.1784384,0.01406655,0.06334475,0.0003846255,0.002113963,0.003436951,0.1744208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8119926,0.006903571,0.04006307,0.001454715,0.006217168,0.0001595396,0.0004825464,0.0007193752,0.1320074],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01108845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03709459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01365451457097314,"score_gpt":0.2785146472583314,"score_spread":0.2648601326873582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}