{"id":"W2766003243","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2017-0258","title":"Reference charts for young stands — a quantitative methodology for assessing tree performance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Northern Research Station; U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Tree (set theory); Quantile; Context (archaeology); Suite; Computer science; Statistics; Ecology; Geography; Mathematics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00929757,0.0009253888,0.0006703074,0.007576718,0.001147392,0.002160854,0.001562811,0.0007370232,0.005042469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03492499,0.0003061503,0.0007369719,0.007207707,0.0009010488,0.002260609,0.001296047,0.001506902,0.001638805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009802431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001353781,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01212393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01478609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955243,0.001685623,0.0003975794,0.000572091,0.001630724,0.0001897392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734725,0.0116109,0.004293808,0.00347455,0.006592625,0.0005556038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004295034,0.000256744,0.1721207,0.0006910873,0.0002328471,0.0005341465,0.005670876,0.04946644,0.01279239,0.08478427,0.04316495,0.6298562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100777,0.001128097,0.5070851,0.0008372815,0.0002117752,0.001765473,0.005223207,0.1674315,0.02414526,0.07477259,0.2164186,0.0008803359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.09001356,0.001050271,0.8717799,0.0002384551,0.0002307147,0.0006128238,0.01007717,0.005799618,0.02019748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4171279,0.000587406,0.5695,0.0001164288,0.0001058878,0.001063418,0.006260303,0.001122676,0.004116102],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01212393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04917079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3080986940978964,"score_gpt":0.4451055653086501,"score_spread":0.1370068712107537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}