{"id":"W2766066668","doi":"10.47339/ephj.2016.106","title":"Evaluation of the public’s knowledge, attitude, and practice on seafood contaminants","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BCIT Environmental Public Health Journal","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contamination; Environmental health; Government (linguistics); Public health; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Test (biology); Mercury (programming language); Food contaminant; Significant difference; Food safety; Psychology; Business; Environmental science; Toxicology; Fishery; Food science; Mathematics; Biology; Ecology; Medicine; Computer science; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005972186,0.0002283608,0.0004089612,0.001277327,0.0005412697,0.0009158956,0.0003219555,0.0007687579,0.002860973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0115661,0.0001985549,0.0005609957,0.0007607649,0.0008014674,0.0008731289,0.000995404,0.0006901572,0.0004402853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001049425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001020864,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003535898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002543679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970415,0.001207535,0.0002870016,0.0001372362,0.0009501082,0.0003764767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987773,0.004519081,0.003542098,0.0003249307,0.002485152,0.001355743],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002824097,0.001203434,0.9672986,0.0001744899,0.0000590685,0.0001958872,0.009313505,0.0001142617,0.0006047057,0.00007892044,0.0003057989,0.0203689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002807308,0.002603039,0.9731549,0.0001033398,0.00004965792,0.0002259218,0.02166634,0.0004656349,0.0004623982,0.00007805682,0.001137765,0.0000247992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987434,0.00004290292,0.00003950175,0.0001100401,0.000003460455,0.00002280781,0.00003620943,0.00000241752,0.0009994125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992951,0.00009650223,0.00008637198,0.00005658549,0.000006057554,0.00003009483,0.00005188225,7.190289e-7,0.0003765617],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005972186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03158432,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1060981705511062,"score_gpt":0.3607611755202583,"score_spread":0.2546630049691522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}