{"id":"W2766066668","doi":"10.47339/ephj.2016.106","title":"Evaluation of the public’s knowledge, attitude, and practice on seafood contaminants","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BCIT Environmental Public Health Journal","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contamination; Environmental health; Government (linguistics); Public health; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Test (biology); Mercury (programming language); Food contaminant; Significant difference; Food safety; Psychology; Business; Environmental science; Toxicology; Fishery; Food science; Mathematics; Biology; Ecology; Medicine; Computer science; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007105255,0.0001551467,0.0001829708,0.0000532797,0.000555138,0.00005368926,0.0002260253,0.00005370099,0.001961039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001365441,0.00008548302,0.00005998276,0.0001331242,0.0004542766,0.0009155698,0.0002346496,0.0001792859,0.0002071817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001147792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001915824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001354959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004376333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962502,0.001268262,0.000437908,0.0002272444,0.001393786,0.0004226451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985191,0.0003090486,0.0005038494,0.0002421039,0.0000287367,0.0003972136],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031958,0.0008551381,0.1037607,0.00001096982,0.0001136928,0.000001504071,0.00183666,0.000005371635,0.003694782,0.0003383484,0.02006759,0.8692833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001889736,0.0003308412,0.7767736,0.000050618,0.00003853345,0.0002673193,0.001168787,0.0000357315,0.0002275105,0.0002300865,0.2188351,0.0001521359],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9320815,0.0007907943,0.000213221,0.05078507,0.000469988,0.0005786979,0.00003130263,0.00001045816,0.01503894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970098,0.0008657306,0.00009405192,0.001483076,0.00007042396,0.00001504738,0.000001041434,0.00001237749,0.0004485054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8691311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989513,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1060981705511062,"score_gpt":0.3607611755202583,"score_spread":0.2546630049691522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}