{"id":"W2766209715","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.189","title":"Ecological Footprint assessment for targeting climate change mitigation in cities: A case study of 15 Canadian cities according to census metropolitan areas","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cleaner Production","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon footprint; Ecological footprint; Metropolitan area; Consumption (sociology); Population; Footprint; Geography; Energy consumption; Renewable energy; Electricity; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Greenhouse gas; Environmental science; Sustainability; Ecology; Economics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001123024,0.0005235872,0.0004074043,0.002487083,0.003770132,0.002348706,0.001248058,0.0005351079,0.001472028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002190476,0.0002670972,0.0008226724,0.007976485,0.0009293376,0.0006179897,0.001043566,0.0005764672,0.0000861052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03685248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03038321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9901358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989541,0.0001478229,0.00003522183,0.00008209909,0.0003690915,0.0004117234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987436,0.0001695718,0.0001066555,0.00005655804,0.0007860987,0.0001374702],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003493267,0.0003815852,0.8723913,0.0001970052,0.0002674004,0.001147707,0.006990334,0.03292883,0.001808739,0.006570795,0.005696534,0.07127044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000314529,0.0001104817,0.9030116,0.00008789609,0.0002406104,0.00022684,0.04252703,0.04118229,0.001080252,0.001024262,0.01039673,0.00008066645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906712,0.0002532045,0.0006696621,0.0003640499,0.000005988,0.0001164223,0.0009108581,0.00001544334,0.006993262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964513,0.0002237574,0.001418398,0.0000335798,0.000001436264,0.00002258094,0.0004229573,0.000006047889,0.00142012],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03685248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2673847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04098258993135052,"score_gpt":0.332311318368416,"score_spread":0.2913287284370655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}