{"id":"W2766500732","doi":"10.1080/21582041.2017.1393556","title":"Environmental impact assessment: evidence-based policymaking in Brazil","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Social Science","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Latin Americans; Environmental impact assessment; Sustainability; Vision; Adjudication; State (computer science); Political science; Public administration; Public economics; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001408486,0.0003080691,0.0003224671,0.0001025604,0.002813398,0.000553216,0.001756248,0.0001214733,0.001252879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001381086,0.0002871924,0.0001783391,0.0003029275,0.003730348,0.004835825,0.000909317,0.0003319144,0.0002183148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002301504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002963329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002984389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008692394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967536,0.0001340024,0.0003742492,0.0007051047,0.001224751,0.0008082546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985856,0.0000733019,0.0004158684,0.0005988118,0.000003984789,0.0003223843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002182425,0.0001730326,0.9594553,0.000002682525,0.000004576488,0.00003041914,0.0006681298,0.0000284821,0.02946264,0.0001050083,0.000321558,0.009726422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006256109,0.00009916492,0.9964975,0.00004365994,0.000004681894,0.000001411985,0.000209104,0.0005450495,0.0006909376,0.0004162537,0.0005220535,0.0003446274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.90969,0.0000542328,0.00005840509,0.001066668,0.0002095197,0.0003714669,0.00001846705,0.00003567952,0.08849556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985459,0.00001539144,0.0002090266,0.0007719222,0.0001255257,0.00002871094,0.000004685967,0.00002224824,0.0002765397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08885594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06921771778026461,"score_gpt":0.4013212535216949,"score_spread":0.3321035357414303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}