{"id":"W2766501523","doi":"10.3138/ijcs.54.5","title":"Interest in and Public Perceptions of Canadian Arctic Sovereignty: Evidence from Editorials, 2000–2014","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Public opinion; Sovereignty; Political science; Politics; Perception; Arctic; Public relations; News media; Media coverage; The arctic; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008156121,0.0003798141,0.0003720444,0.007721433,0.01161711,0.00945434,0.0009378952,0.001236397,0.005080712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05415175,0.0003357474,0.0002373884,0.01146346,0.006082608,0.002079807,0.002116484,0.001576791,0.0003294886],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03658797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06885552,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9456317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9624622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923745,0.0009846032,0.0003517102,0.0005573975,0.004808612,0.0009231769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9203554,0.03594975,0.01089945,0.001343231,0.0272945,0.004157669],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006081926,0.00009035865,0.1847859,0.003366266,0.0002077549,0.002321326,0.6160087,0.0003197001,0.001690715,0.01457335,0.09223855,0.08378927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003109859,0.00004735921,0.3753493,0.001752071,0.0001609285,0.0002312683,0.2748845,0.0001878695,0.0007171615,0.0008622771,0.3456465,0.0001296697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7736424,0.02117054,0.0002792994,0.02467358,0.00154641,0.0001036274,0.004921571,0.00004993266,0.1736127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808493,0.008207879,0.0001580544,0.002158525,0.0004370358,0.00002727304,0.0007184783,0.00003371026,0.007409697],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2654656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1079332138954031,"score_gpt":0.3564892684288685,"score_spread":0.2485560545334654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}