{"id":"W2766501523","doi":"10.3138/ijcs.54.5","title":"Interest in and Public Perceptions of Canadian Arctic Sovereignty: Evidence from Editorials, 2000–2014","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Public opinion; Sovereignty; Political science; Politics; Perception; Arctic; Public relations; News media; Media coverage; The arctic; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005802254,0.00009773827,0.0002566994,0.001926521,0.0001970264,0.00004410294,0.0003673513,0.00006454731,0.000318505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004223722,0.00006977755,0.00006497864,0.0002992717,0.0006486167,0.0004507786,0.0000472982,0.0001174744,0.000012846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001416396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002363616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998703,0.0001338829,0.0004104453,0.0001191438,0.0003341796,0.0002993335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976129,0.0007332568,0.000229261,0.00006950455,0.0009223879,0.0004326794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006069204,0.00004209911,0.5733532,0.00001548852,0.001464582,0.0001946146,0.07488357,0.00000153403,0.0001673388,0.1016026,0.2225253,0.02568885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009503167,0.0001208939,0.4772218,0.002034056,0.00006835802,0.00002382191,0.09441975,0.000001256821,0.00002325505,0.0471554,0.3776504,0.0003306981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6888127,0.006560594,0.00001069146,0.2900418,0.007767053,0.000126409,0.0002181466,0.000005371231,0.006457206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750048,0.02087732,0.000114036,0.0002876936,0.003516229,0.000002801318,3.964981e-7,0.000005823985,0.0001909228],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2897541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5056494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1079332138954031,"score_gpt":0.3564892684288685,"score_spread":0.2485560545334654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}