{"id":"W2766572348","doi":"10.7334/psicothema2017.178","title":"The maximum likelihood alignment approach to testing for approximate measurement invariance: A paradigmatic cross-cultural application","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psicothema","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences","keywords":"Measurement invariance; Confirmatory factor analysis; Range (aeronautics); Trustworthiness; Scale (ratio); Econometrics; Scale invariance; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Test (biology); Psychology; Structural equation modeling; Social psychology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01574421,0.0002294655,0.0003589615,0.00009746643,0.002497683,0.003056624,0.002478448,0.00007223579,0.000004323086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1287373,0.0001270463,0.0001353387,0.0005397663,0.0001888584,0.0003433084,0.0003233549,0.0001134465,0.00006109615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001137157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005537259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004468144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000593849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960711,0.000158528,0.000802769,0.0007724329,0.00157397,0.0006211895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887248,0.007278897,0.0009461019,0.001978385,0.0008867708,0.0001850858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007911711,0.0001795794,0.02047612,0.00005566216,0.00005243448,4.094946e-7,0.0007805073,0.0002314541,0.003786702,0.01796051,0.004164894,0.9522326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001308786,0.0002068858,0.05701079,0.00007896392,0.00003735873,0.00002294934,0.001378384,0.05030885,0.002176464,0.8618892,0.02504427,0.0005371062],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0292351,0.0002408427,0.9131114,0.001963903,0.0006545138,0.002296106,0.00001424579,0.0001079898,0.05237587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.734682,0.000003738103,0.2634291,0.0002080931,0.000272033,0.001191905,0.000001294536,0.00002138139,0.0001904251],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9516955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5309592073977307,"score_gpt":0.4789024761668101,"score_spread":0.05205673123092058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}