{"id":"W2766572348","doi":"10.7334/psicothema2017.178","title":"The maximum likelihood alignment approach to testing for approximate measurement invariance: A paradigmatic cross-cultural application","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psicothema","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences","keywords":"Measurement invariance; Confirmatory factor analysis; Range (aeronautics); Trustworthiness; Scale (ratio); Econometrics; Scale invariance; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Test (biology); Psychology; Structural equation modeling; Social psychology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09824733,0.00171895,0.001967866,0.003646969,0.002696119,0.003117005,0.003205194,0.00184356,0.005017116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2356735,0.001214255,0.002520054,0.005605077,0.007570152,0.0041979,0.005262375,0.006121835,0.0008262604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001820445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003704584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001961159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001693922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8277492,0.1577265,0.002716261,0.005342614,0.00582822,0.000637205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7071017,0.263377,0.008476815,0.01398277,0.006364897,0.0006967384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005255576,0.000565648,0.03832951,0.001235942,0.00178938,0.0007211575,0.007132852,0.03480976,0.003317193,0.4382186,0.003876596,0.4694777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002677111,0.0009057742,0.01513564,0.0005094786,0.0002089985,0.0009776352,0.001987749,0.1827037,0.00321497,0.7818095,0.01207797,0.0002008225],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007550004,0.0002050215,0.9886103,0.0005736413,0.00004150394,0.0003359795,0.0000484769,0.0001326537,0.00250233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1517615,0.0002532063,0.8443764,0.000291975,0.00009767288,0.002709149,0.0001079525,0.0001143269,0.0002877777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09824733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5195878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5309592073977307,"score_gpt":0.4789024761668101,"score_spread":0.05205673123092058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}