{"id":"W2766875239","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.009","title":"Explaining odds ratios as conditional risk ratios","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Odds ratio; Odds; Interpretation (philosophy); Conditional independence; Recall; Independence (probability theory); Statistics; Medicine; Mathematics; Psychology; Philosophy; Logistic regression; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0170557,0.000772441,0.0009048635,0.00171981,0.0005762503,0.003546136,0.001802533,0.005802774,0.004663252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2161966,0.0006931898,0.001082538,0.002035988,0.003515432,0.006307549,0.001595761,0.01256681,0.001884903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001490174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001086567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004186562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002801929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916595,0.006278894,0.0003850186,0.0004796007,0.0009634264,0.0002335812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8196527,0.1639984,0.004483524,0.0060271,0.005020009,0.0008182425],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002003083,0.00005917823,0.01741314,0.0001865127,0.0002577922,0.001165927,0.0005727833,0.007217974,0.0001533218,0.6350909,0.2552828,0.08239924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006798592,0.00001520316,0.001887141,0.0001766632,0.00006747492,0.0006487345,0.00008461452,0.02332752,0.0001426578,0.9444278,0.02911835,0.000035931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01219056,0.009033136,0.1313033,0.8231086,0.008778169,0.00004656318,0.0009360487,0.0005438905,0.01405972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5990239,0.01765851,0.05065551,0.2343756,0.07255872,0.0003126653,0.0008702726,0.0006883661,0.02385645],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9829443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09020025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7778813850800665,"score_gpt":0.6090544562743831,"score_spread":0.1688269288056834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}