{"id":"W2766895027","doi":"10.1007/s11229-017-1607-5","title":"The variety-of-evidence thesis: a Bayesian exploration of its surprising failures","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Philosophy of language; Philosophy of science; Independence (probability theory); Ceteris paribus; Set (abstract data type); Diversity (politics); Metaphysics; Bayesian probability; Epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy; Sociology; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03287532,0.001145391,0.002637341,0.004277467,0.002579447,0.006018824,0.005577629,0.005160062,0.012861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1952253,0.001163071,0.001326565,0.003440163,0.01995655,0.02307321,0.004069701,0.007233311,0.0009326001],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002417685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002016653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001819847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001895314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9847991,0.009124821,0.0007927279,0.002479554,0.002420171,0.0003835446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7405217,0.2307748,0.006647736,0.01457042,0.005994846,0.001490555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005453674,0.00001404512,0.000736705,0.0001765784,0.00009719157,0.00009368383,0.0004963965,0.001948966,0.00006353048,0.9784678,0.002589519,0.01526103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001108474,0.000004166114,0.0001217902,0.00004777764,0.00001325602,0.00003712225,0.00004936775,0.002627617,0.00003447927,0.9956873,0.00135885,0.000007083446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04134925,0.01681324,0.7261802,0.128919,0.001164363,0.0001101817,0.0007145614,0.0004264152,0.08432283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9167696,0.004779172,0.06740008,0.004337541,0.002544491,0.000172761,0.0001841822,0.0002072338,0.003604848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1738634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3069739598420298,"score_gpt":0.3141165993955742,"score_spread":0.007142639553544383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}