{"id":"W2767150508","doi":"10.4995/vlc.2017.6952","title":"Hacia una arquitectura pragmática. El caso de Tous y Fargas","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VLC arquitectura Research Journal","topic":"Architecture and Art History Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Abandonment (legal); Architecture; Context (archaeology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Product (mathematics); Nonconformist; Estate; Humanities; Politics; Sociology; Economy; Political science; Welfare economics; History; Economics; Law; Art; Computer science; Mathematics; Process (computing)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002749964,0.0004577167,0.0005393564,0.0006711131,0.01639656,0.002664261,0.001784865,0.0001425017,0.003133625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001985896,0.0003391651,0.0003631083,0.00008694515,0.002879795,0.0005805942,0.0007414718,0.002712785,0.0006471502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004572198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004532653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004012932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001842334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950831,0.0004826526,0.0005851295,0.0005492902,0.001423707,0.001876133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965494,0.0004913496,0.0003928372,0.001058964,0.0009038022,0.0006036617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010976,0.0005466926,0.003531601,0.0003569472,0.001359475,0.004756051,0.3375064,0.0002081704,0.006764674,0.07535607,0.2332282,0.3352881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009619312,0.0006144606,0.002763373,0.0002554659,0.00005195884,0.001009105,0.004681959,0.00009878304,0.0006022163,0.02347717,0.964888,0.000595603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6991692,0.004741254,0.0005440972,0.01128015,0.002264704,0.0007699883,0.00007537498,0.0002529453,0.2809023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742891,0.000288382,0.0003244558,0.0004991944,0.005955083,0.00003986814,0.00000402354,0.00007985283,0.01852003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7316598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1068690330897256,"score_gpt":0.3858132981528411,"score_spread":0.2789442650631155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}