{"id":"W2767436254","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.10.014","title":"Relative rates not relative risks: addressing a widespread misinterpretation of hazard ratios","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Epidemiology","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relative risk; Medicine; Magnitude (astronomy); Hazard; Terminology; Statistics; Interpretation (philosophy); Proportional hazards model; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Confidence interval; Mathematics; Computer science; Surgery; Internal medicine; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1292693,0.001625038,0.002556703,0.007693251,0.002560017,0.01096746,0.005838026,0.009116394,0.002457862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.474494,0.001194073,0.001496951,0.005381808,0.03116757,0.01668026,0.005605322,0.02037019,0.001155609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003265405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004159332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002953145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002796093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8560735,0.1102709,0.01076724,0.006799699,0.01524574,0.0008429025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5014933,0.4221366,0.02294324,0.02067008,0.03027875,0.002478053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002143867,0.00004155267,0.005280792,0.001053691,0.0003055846,0.001705194,0.01596836,0.001222659,0.0007557513,0.7857859,0.09236414,0.09530196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000817914,0.0000757344,0.001763534,0.001666029,0.0001973497,0.004081668,0.004867047,0.00416312,0.001078229,0.8507062,0.1311292,0.0001900204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01368082,0.0458787,0.2738073,0.6331227,0.01982086,0.00005422061,0.0003534943,0.0005841513,0.01269786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4994763,0.0309522,0.1732287,0.2193586,0.07081237,0.0002388667,0.000164571,0.001285453,0.004482924],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8707307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6836497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8410438313475054,"score_gpt":0.5977036410247712,"score_spread":0.2433401903227341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}