{"id":"W2768067353","doi":"10.1002/wsb.827","title":"A comparison of field methods to estimate Canada goose abundance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Society Bulletin","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources; North Carolina State University","keywords":"Goose; Abundance (ecology); Wildlife; Population; Aerial survey; Geography; Waterfowl; Survey methodology; Hunting season; Habitat; Ecology; Statistics; Fishery; Environmental science; Biology; Demography; Mathematics; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010387,0.000806869,0.0005565218,0.005572424,0.001190511,0.001410418,0.00190638,0.0005182032,0.002269212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01922867,0.0004737845,0.0005441093,0.003268361,0.0004805933,0.0009764299,0.0008342091,0.0004187585,0.0005781281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003879454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003104557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3751178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4899101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906293,0.003104911,0.0004939575,0.001621661,0.003863047,0.0002871492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.955501,0.01038866,0.004272268,0.002003843,0.02726336,0.0005708792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007019761,0.0004093341,0.7651488,0.0008715622,0.0008472602,0.000112028,0.00201484,0.005315823,0.004395216,0.00077542,0.00746384,0.211944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001168649,0.0004786801,0.9351164,0.0005780659,0.0003171547,0.0002431911,0.002439401,0.04036202,0.004452228,0.0005241813,0.01520438,0.0001674633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8390473,0.005812106,0.1167104,0.000597016,0.0003731851,0.002613899,0.01028218,0.001451972,0.02311192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.830362,0.002367924,0.1510889,0.0007254764,0.0001447678,0.002510701,0.006275275,0.000197985,0.006326936],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3751178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7458688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0201096456917476,"score_gpt":0.3514003578463128,"score_spread":0.3312907121545652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}