{"id":"W2768354687","doi":"10.1130/abs/2017ne-290789","title":"A PETROGRAPHIC AND GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF THE KRVY KIMBERLITE, LAKE TAMISKAMING KIMBERLITE FIELD, ONTARIO, CANADA","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kimberlite; Petrography; Geology; Geochemistry; Mining engineering; Mantle (geology)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001824045,0.0002479375,0.0002594626,0.003123072,0.004536205,0.0009636116,0.000877822,0.0002508847,0.003042783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005939399,0.0003269051,0.0001898852,0.003672249,0.0007030737,0.0003131109,0.0005922175,0.0002565251,0.0004694486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01253246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01400233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9877236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997721,0.000007181428,0.000008959936,0.00004147816,0.0001118961,0.00005835484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995285,0.00001604292,0.00004740188,0.00001418625,0.0003254686,0.0000683555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004104334,0.00007620174,0.9173017,0.0002547387,0.00009036073,0.001437994,0.009337204,0.0008106367,0.01945671,0.0007418275,0.00516072,0.04492151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000595032,0.00001194686,0.9927451,0.00001966067,0.00001241744,0.00009709362,0.002112556,0.000205525,0.000429389,0.00002120067,0.004334054,0.000005099072],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833021,0.0006161335,0.0003215856,0.0001800208,0.000006760446,0.00008558944,0.003224,0.00002998066,0.01223383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849717,0.0003777226,0.001043205,0.00005156362,0.000003375141,0.00002374107,0.001447128,0.0000206071,0.0120609],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01253246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09092975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01057099188575085,"score_gpt":0.2135717681282475,"score_spread":0.2030007762424967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}