{"id":"W2769013641","doi":"10.1080/09612025.2017.1403094","title":"Harriet Clisby’s ‘Sketches of Australia’: travel writing and colonial refigurations in Boston’s <i>Woman’s Journal</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women s History Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Medical Association; National Library of Australia","keywords":"Vision; Colonialism; Audience measurement; Context (archaeology); White (mutation); Immigration; Race (biology); Gender studies; Ethnic group; Media studies; Sociology; History; Political science; Anthropology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001918807,0.00008812901,0.0003804302,0.0001887151,0.001227205,0.0001546746,0.0003458632,0.00007932425,0.00128451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005074627,0.0001130972,0.00007968666,0.00006643101,0.0009775152,0.0004719244,0.00002564104,0.0002356677,0.00002628357],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004358059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001079442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0792089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4306271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986505,0.0001964232,0.0004426082,0.0001665882,0.0002483467,0.0002955699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989093,0.00003888149,0.0004696458,0.0002594647,0.00008676377,0.0002359326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003650312,0.0001687169,0.00541434,0.003646021,0.00006035158,0.0001713531,0.1313608,3.069665e-7,0.0006041121,0.03641528,0.8004209,0.02170124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001767649,0.00002467569,0.01019863,0.0009142932,0.00002405967,0.000007747257,0.0008384556,1.407136e-7,7.832458e-7,0.0001311586,0.9875633,0.000120024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4050026,0.434019,0.000003806447,0.01691191,0.003015671,0.001301357,0.0001051527,0.00004576525,0.1395947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7153301,0.2142248,0.000160943,0.001705914,0.000594784,0.0001216853,0.000005147713,0.00003147426,0.06782518],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3514182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06689171567706037,"score_gpt":0.3219214393638133,"score_spread":0.2550297236867529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}