{"id":"W2769196935","doi":"10.1109/tvt.2017.2772035","title":"Coverage Analysis of Max-SIR Cell Association in HetNets Under Nakagami Fading","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology","topic":"Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nakagami distribution; Fading; Path loss; Rician fading; Computer science; Stochastic geometry; Fading distribution; Maximal-ratio combining; Telecommunications link; Probability density function; Algorithm; Mathematics; Statistics; Telecommunications; Wireless; Rayleigh fading; Decoding methods","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001314883,0.000153151,0.0003658934,0.001174751,0.0001228324,0.00002093182,0.0002287759,0.000407875,0.00002145942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001323006,0.000182339,0.0001244104,0.0007552563,0.00003781766,0.0001894022,0.000001927234,0.0003211241,0.00001325351],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004207899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001086749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003485328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000365657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990628,0.00002353297,0.0003297917,0.0002174931,0.0001326015,0.000233731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991207,0.00004266164,0.000177108,0.000572624,0.00006202927,0.00002493824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003693434,0.00004759399,0.001147632,0.00002280159,0.0002676998,0.00000524956,0.00003931524,0.9736764,0.02301753,0.00006856446,0.000004167273,0.001699303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001127281,0.00006025233,0.002985224,0.0000691391,0.0005331043,0.000003392816,0.0001330756,0.7313446,0.2628387,0.0003518161,0.0001598346,0.0003936019],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2789633,0.00006065964,0.719875,0.00007292059,0.0002131185,0.0001462207,0.00001995834,0.0002161308,0.0004327824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985134,0.000138999,0.001086694,0.000008862567,0.000006015928,0.00004139928,0.000005654227,0.00003046372,0.0001685344],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7195501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7435568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007252519254339253,"score_gpt":0.2252239332658577,"score_spread":0.2179714140115184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}