{"id":"W2769723723","doi":"10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001179","title":"Evaluation of Design Provisions for Pedestrian Bridges Using a Structural Reliability Framework","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Bridge Engineering","topic":"Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pedestrian; Structural reliability; Reliability (semiconductor); Engineering; Structural engineering; Civil engineering; Forensic engineering; Reliability engineering; Transport engineering; Computer science; Probabilistic logic; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005461408,0.001085184,0.0005812498,0.002345135,0.0002846604,0.000526721,0.0008982132,0.0008495653,0.0006673539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007940089,0.0003313168,0.0006691397,0.0005002002,0.000449221,0.00062429,0.000629797,0.0004092077,0.0001274481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008136778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001130134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002118873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003330856,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968671,0.00120159,0.0001103851,0.0002152953,0.001424829,0.0001806884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957364,0.002003005,0.0006645395,0.0003839009,0.001140967,0.0000712748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006572538,0.00008553945,0.003859934,0.00009361008,0.00003251185,0.00009212276,0.0001175612,0.9537923,0.0104776,0.003376967,0.0001964639,0.02780958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001245101,0.0007699093,0.005834961,0.00004114459,0.00005024793,0.0001008864,0.0001210858,0.9829338,0.007303676,0.001914328,0.0008911408,0.00002640096],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5016499,0.0004175879,0.4925845,0.000107648,0.00001406597,0.0001743957,0.000192302,0.0003751644,0.004484362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483446,0.000141629,0.05086379,0.00001262945,0.000008041884,0.000092147,0.0001415333,0.00002621928,0.0003693604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005461408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02888304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08459277368318355,"score_gpt":0.3401703247956404,"score_spread":0.2555775511124568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}