{"id":"W2769723723","doi":"10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001179","title":"Evaluation of Design Provisions for Pedestrian Bridges Using a Structural Reliability Framework","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Bridge Engineering","topic":"Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pedestrian; Structural reliability; Reliability (semiconductor); Engineering; Structural engineering; Civil engineering; Forensic engineering; Reliability engineering; Transport engineering; Computer science; Probabilistic logic; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001390163,0.0001760079,0.0003757082,0.0002057871,0.0001166828,0.00008973844,0.0002938439,0.0001026744,0.00001293982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002454296,0.0001646548,0.0002340195,0.00009954713,0.00002978932,0.000423982,0.00001977618,0.0002316913,2.252902e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002054014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008977772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001947305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001252351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985806,0.00003079526,0.000583476,0.0001089949,0.0005013519,0.0001947374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984203,0.0001932303,0.0003124442,0.0003570949,0.0006156323,0.0001013241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001142559,0.000003344038,0.0001702808,0.00009831631,0.0001273889,9.159925e-7,0.00009510553,0.9874403,0.005179318,0.00003003071,0.00002492821,0.006818658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004757191,0.00004987277,0.01984249,0.000174906,0.0003361076,0.00003122777,0.00002176019,0.9650914,0.01350547,0.0002926466,0.00002095998,0.0001574092],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3951,0.0002061592,0.603916,0.00002204928,0.0005799136,0.000135499,0.00000830409,0.00002784538,0.000004230511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9391169,0.00001957895,0.06051898,0.000001416664,0.0003023102,0.000004409969,0.000001399009,0.0000334885,0.000001513214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5440169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6714426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08459277368318355,"score_gpt":0.3401703247956404,"score_spread":0.2555775511124568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}