{"id":"W2769771023","doi":"10.3390/lubricants5040046","title":"The Evaluation of Linear Complementarity Problem Method in Modeling the Fluid Cavitation for Squeeze Film Damper with Off-Centered Whirling Motion","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lubricants","topic":"Tribology and Lubrication Engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Pratt and Whitney Canada","keywords":"Cavitation; Damper; Compressibility; Complementarity (molecular biology); Structural engineering; Computer science; Mechanics; Engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005699193,0.0006837121,0.0005348899,0.0004372002,0.0004918754,0.0005665715,0.0006656357,0.0008540424,0.001677835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008927606,0.0002556684,0.0005551129,0.0003034735,0.0006138002,0.0006425287,0.0006236174,0.0007147139,0.0001554698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005130104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001128974,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01085463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004940943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997806,0.00009267397,0.000007268103,0.00003019532,0.00006284224,0.00002641298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995633,0.0002841565,0.00003794739,0.00001365081,0.00007976282,0.00002129273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003221913,0.00003500697,0.0005342043,0.0001113801,0.00001684363,0.0001233996,0.00006264101,0.9725766,0.003758991,0.0134759,0.0004237838,0.008849111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001182427,0.000006485223,0.00001754044,0.000001292353,0.000001013429,0.000004349814,0.000003132668,0.9994266,0.0001778185,0.0002633145,0.00009589754,0.000001483321],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02601735,0.0003589336,0.9668137,0.0001734019,0.00005245827,0.00006409809,0.00003431483,0.0001491008,0.006336582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8567581,0.0006414468,0.1360114,0.00009028806,0.00005805862,0.0002703288,0.00007911446,0.00008371969,0.006007554],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01085463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0215829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0797462532460775,"score_gpt":0.3444006722718659,"score_spread":0.2646544190257885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}