{"id":"W2769844601","doi":"10.2514/6.2015-0695","title":"Aerodynamic Optimization Trade Study of a Box-Wing Aircraft Configuration","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference","topic":"Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Aerodynamics; Transonic; Wing; Wing configuration; Lift-induced drag; Inviscid flow; Lift-to-drag ratio; Aerospace engineering; Airfoil; Control theory (sociology); Drag; Wing loading; Longitudinal static stability; Wing twist; Mach number; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Angle of attack","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003381108,0.0006230643,0.0008679674,0.0001557966,0.000276057,0.0002303832,0.0006525259,0.0003244769,0.0006168035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002204802,0.0005273403,0.00007031937,0.0002844174,0.0006229338,0.0007393489,0.0003448076,0.0002768366,0.000008631421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002656942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006233298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001083042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001195475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964631,0.0002606309,0.001032084,0.0009556186,0.000685204,0.000603395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982741,0.00006524764,0.0006443664,0.0006977024,0.00008366982,0.0002348678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002670481,0.0005697258,0.04542149,0.0007484881,0.0007258761,0.0002299958,0.0189641,0.15326,0.4702978,0.1034847,0.0007730171,0.2028543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01081717,0.003343996,0.6448154,0.0002037419,0.0004754048,0.0003872466,0.01223292,0.1555573,0.0506971,0.1172532,0.000223239,0.003993271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9751938,0.00005366933,0.02168781,0.0001717915,0.0008237812,0.001147488,0.0001955653,0.0002663314,0.0004597875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889443,0.00005541559,0.01044074,0.00006875693,0.00006691938,0.00003763868,0.0002379236,0.00004860755,0.00009968001],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5993939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01716698949224949,"score_gpt":0.2383157896229099,"score_spread":0.2211488001306604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}