{"id":"W2769844601","doi":"10.2514/6.2015-0695","title":"Aerodynamic Optimization Trade Study of a Box-Wing Aircraft Configuration","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference","topic":"Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Aerodynamics; Transonic; Wing; Wing configuration; Lift-induced drag; Inviscid flow; Lift-to-drag ratio; Aerospace engineering; Airfoil; Control theory (sociology); Drag; Wing loading; Longitudinal static stability; Wing twist; Mach number; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Angle of attack","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003860135,0.0002786732,0.0003867807,0.0002307961,0.0002376446,0.0004495493,0.0001804838,0.0003613555,0.002287189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005934168,0.0001412562,0.0002880775,0.0001691127,0.0002375961,0.0003341604,0.0003118481,0.0002561178,0.0001963395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001863268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002903803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001305424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001850995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998811,0.00004299532,0.000004712576,0.00001766348,0.0000321672,0.00002127256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997432,0.0001425998,0.00003370423,0.00002760851,0.00003743845,0.00001545451],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003299153,0.0001366752,0.005544492,0.0001220408,0.00006071408,0.0002572251,0.00004155356,0.9471209,0.03104278,0.00302516,0.0005070174,0.01181168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003453477,0.0005577048,0.006995216,0.00001922116,0.00002540457,0.000105657,0.0000562747,0.9818509,0.00902677,0.0004597707,0.0008497104,0.0000188517],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9607942,0.0002220902,0.02759254,0.00006667893,0.00001771352,0.00004293471,0.0002494255,0.0000677158,0.01094661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869892,0.00008101618,0.01133774,0.0000198836,0.000003498562,0.00002465516,0.0001268085,0.00002003213,0.001397173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002287189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007651389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01716698949224949,"score_gpt":0.2383157896229099,"score_spread":0.2211488001306604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}