{"id":"W2769896894","doi":"10.1007/s13595-017-0669-3","title":"Stand-level wind damage can be assessed using diachronic photogrammetric canopy height models","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Forest Science","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Photogrammetry; Storm; Environmental science; Canopy; Range (aeronautics); Volume (thermodynamics); Scale (ratio); Mean squared error; Remote sensing; Meteorology; Geography; Statistics; Mathematics; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004775021,0.0006478429,0.0003572437,0.0014223,0.0003121331,0.0006631766,0.0005837857,0.0006105059,0.002059952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001414341,0.0002802981,0.0004084124,0.001351257,0.0002215376,0.001136968,0.0004978414,0.0002473475,0.001116912],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005128334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000251643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005253927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02137269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997119,0.00004917828,0.00002409831,0.00006772921,0.0001115391,0.00003546055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993086,0.0002207878,0.0001843722,0.000122143,0.0001213694,0.00004268988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005149168,0.0006108317,0.5566773,0.000194992,0.0002905627,0.0002674368,0.0002429002,0.2063429,0.02663519,0.002044874,0.002470747,0.2037073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002995671,0.0002601707,0.5141048,0.00003214327,0.0001124525,0.0002947384,0.0001832176,0.4737693,0.007073408,0.002464226,0.001599781,0.00007566563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.920213,0.0001835599,0.06583621,0.00008155977,0.00003061617,0.00009556059,0.003082756,0.0008245403,0.009652346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897858,0.00007065453,0.007841506,0.00002134057,0.000006415195,0.00003303153,0.001121399,0.00002493237,0.001095017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005253927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01044673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1637911879635332,"score_gpt":0.3562523183319802,"score_spread":0.1924611303684469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}