{"id":"W2770004975","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2017.10.016","title":"A Comparison of Regorafenib and TAS-102 for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Clinical Colorectal Cancer","topic":"Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Regorafenib; Medicine; Colorectal cancer; Placebo; Internal medicine; Randomized controlled trial; Hazard ratio; Oncology; Meta-analysis; Randomization; Cochrane Library; Confidence interval; Cancer; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002142418,0.001108043,0.03406132,0.0002194904,0.0003730694,0.00007590852,0.0003698035,0.0004324848,0.0002141709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001778333,0.0006784055,0.00630722,0.0007411991,0.000829741,0.00008759512,0.0003323863,0.0006799677,0.000002864281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002866726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008635721,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002787728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002337115,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992675,0.0007942048,0.003976292,0.001389892,0.000516335,0.0006482476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902324,0.003696342,0.004309657,0.0007471278,0.0005778273,0.0004366349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003418218,0.0002442634,0.0006480559,0.6286212,0.3386221,0.00001423618,0.00005425316,0.000001343529,4.165706e-8,0.00002563313,0.002174027,0.02925314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009526655,0.001854247,0.0002085536,0.06476397,0.8586139,0.00002656024,0.00002092773,0.00006403609,5.624401e-7,0.00002151756,0.0729496,0.000523469],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001015989,0.9851124,0.00001114289,0.0003985041,0.0003497528,0.01234778,0.00149293,0.0000430473,0.0001428232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001493218,0.9845191,0.0003524084,0.0002487321,0.0002482953,0.01229975,0.0001605597,0.000097591,0.0005803718],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5638571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4372233562728036,"score_gpt":0.5595940720918068,"score_spread":0.1223707158190032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}