{"id":"W2770556267","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2017-0232","title":"Development of an economically sustainable and balanced tactical forest management plan: a case study in Quebec","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; FPInnovations","keywords":"Business; Sustainable forest management; Forest management; Environmental economics; Sustainable development; Environmental resource management; Operations research; Computer science; Economics; Engineering; Forestry; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002088555,0.0001084837,0.000203098,0.0004568006,0.0005308075,0.0002904218,0.0006541262,0.00004680131,0.0003427232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001210961,0.00009861089,0.00002555093,0.00012983,0.0004540302,0.0006512708,0.0002650255,0.0002838956,0.00002987298],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006536409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004208156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4734901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9843146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983594,0.00009705119,0.0003989827,0.0001968118,0.000306127,0.0006416279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987224,0.00004536703,0.000147865,0.0003743634,0.00004083128,0.0006691609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006798173,0.00010933,0.9699579,0.0000379663,0.00003055735,0.01634767,0.002844646,0.0003819849,0.0000024151,0.001835612,0.0007885434,0.007595397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001099376,0.0003161422,0.9796393,0.00002912388,0.000008102553,0.0001903274,0.006032297,0.0003330937,0.000005314807,0.000469561,0.01176152,0.0001158333],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882651,0.00001101929,0.000003387091,0.0002623307,0.00003158421,0.0004415904,0.000001366639,0.000001267162,0.01098236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958568,0.000004044105,0.0008066659,0.00001276513,0.00003279554,0.00001203508,9.382326e-7,0.00001107556,0.003262903],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5108246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.530016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04318844015703304,"score_gpt":0.3290283426628782,"score_spread":0.2858399025058452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}