{"id":"W2770556267","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2017-0232","title":"Development of an economically sustainable and balanced tactical forest management plan: a case study in Quebec","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; FPInnovations","keywords":"Business; Sustainable forest management; Forest management; Environmental economics; Sustainable development; Environmental resource management; Operations research; Computer science; Economics; Engineering; Forestry; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006923177,0.000717069,0.000354128,0.0007451408,0.003092218,0.001850659,0.001735386,0.001842776,0.004224912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001271647,0.0003014895,0.0005004787,0.001776705,0.001083928,0.0005527243,0.0006039359,0.0007918876,0.0002331872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02584727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01693358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9652386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9800786,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994895,0.0001411524,0.00001381421,0.0000560242,0.0000958682,0.0002034762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999319,0.0002886158,0.00004603251,0.00002628698,0.0001941152,0.0001261652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002267407,0.0005970011,0.01592194,0.0002554754,0.00005874101,0.004341534,0.0005643836,0.9332803,0.002369621,0.01065377,0.005630743,0.02609977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001685117,0.0002002008,0.01225072,0.00007111024,0.00004816012,0.0001675252,0.004319558,0.9721372,0.001474747,0.001412928,0.007684083,0.000065317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9449226,0.000436118,0.01787937,0.0009691663,0.00003318483,0.0006727483,0.001219244,0.0001617215,0.03370577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788244,0.0002095026,0.01364502,0.00006849906,0.000004486572,0.0001082635,0.0003559815,0.00002401859,0.006759928],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03476137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1875359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04318844015703304,"score_gpt":0.3290283426628782,"score_spread":0.2858399025058452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}