{"id":"W2770571241","doi":"10.1016/j.talanta.2017.11.051","title":"Determination of the optimal number of components in independent components analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Talanta","topic":"Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Conseil National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université Libanaise; Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie","keywords":"Independent component analysis; Computation; Blind signal separation; Algorithm; Generalization; Residual; Reliability (semiconductor); Principal component analysis; Pattern recognition (psychology); Chemistry; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004939992,0.002585655,0.002387326,0.002114164,0.001359352,0.002302031,0.00115001,0.001814256,0.001340652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01823102,0.001111972,0.001659396,0.002243848,0.001156493,0.00245602,0.001186427,0.002126301,0.001088865],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006890807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002865214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002228616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002873741,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967981,0.00129652,0.0003117456,0.0005884168,0.0007391473,0.0002660441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947455,0.00317045,0.0001945385,0.0004611721,0.001304453,0.0001238658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002139085,0.001314407,0.004791688,0.001609514,0.0003703851,0.0003479723,0.0006461347,0.09289581,0.2504933,0.01413416,0.003382531,0.627875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001428052,0.0003841838,0.008408031,0.0002023518,0.000499855,0.0003423974,0.0002118094,0.7458107,0.2217245,0.01537156,0.006662007,0.0002397875],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06365139,0.001270042,0.9324685,0.0001487331,0.00008121367,0.000315389,0.0001707662,0.0007406903,0.001153258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1668139,0.0006417737,0.8308083,0.00004743423,0.00002787188,0.0006306357,0.0002587176,0.0002221484,0.0005493326],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004939992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02612549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03137633766917391,"score_gpt":0.3120657695450632,"score_spread":0.2806894318758892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}