{"id":"W2770816112","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.003","title":"Mapping language to visual referents: Does the degree of image realism matter?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Psychologica","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Referent; Noun; Verb; Comprehension; Visual language; Psychology; Situated; Cognition; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Stimulus (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Communication; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004518417,0.0002043938,0.0002590744,0.0000967376,0.0003109059,0.0001075792,0.001001404,0.0001388625,0.005233055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001666728,0.0001101981,0.0001238109,0.00009542968,0.0001845943,0.0001250938,0.0001614682,0.0002406955,0.001226229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001309136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006363596,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003910999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005426395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984169,0.0002090783,0.0003199097,0.0004741163,0.000205399,0.0003745832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997875,0.00009597887,0.0003190826,0.001530681,0.00007266942,0.000106606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001916122,0.002039232,0.04632235,0.0001086078,0.0008023732,0.0006377968,0.07609549,1.048532e-7,0.2701245,0.006029054,0.327305,0.2686194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006869739,0.0001358389,0.976898,0.000052923,0.00003712441,0.00002181415,0.00744148,6.884062e-7,0.0007363855,0.001547573,0.0122028,0.0002384144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7843055,0.00008442599,0.0002193922,0.004202237,0.0009364117,0.0003088895,0.00005388542,0.00005767732,0.2098316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902029,0.00002262296,0.0004059257,0.003546185,0.0003139245,0.00008955917,0.00002542453,0.00002516288,0.005368274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9305756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06616392010271059,"score_gpt":0.3728946468136727,"score_spread":0.3067307267109621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}