{"id":"W2770949740","doi":"10.1007/s11367-017-1422-8","title":"Ecosystem quality in LCIA: status quo, harmonization, and suggestions for the way forward","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Harmonization; Ecosystem; Quality (philosophy); Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem approach; Natural resource economics; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental economics; Ecology; Political science; Economics; Biology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001824701,0.00008771506,0.0001338563,0.00002303526,0.0003633999,0.0002073087,0.0006846502,0.0000284039,0.0001432611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005570936,0.00005072347,0.00007263987,0.00002480353,0.0001719106,0.0004216969,0.0002707342,0.0001533634,0.000003349803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005932077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005498783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005626286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001017367,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986984,0.0001004799,0.0004291133,0.0001077277,0.0005004838,0.0001638352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987398,0.0003777065,0.0005023078,0.0002375671,0.00004980032,0.00009275996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009156993,0.0001501423,0.9801466,0.000006532569,0.00008332004,0.000003927853,0.0005585866,0.007606708,0.0003034688,0.001540489,0.0005548508,0.008953799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007205569,0.00004468521,0.9869176,0.00001356305,0.00001743171,0.0000100735,0.001096535,0.00487717,0.00008242088,0.003144169,0.003013131,0.00006270422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.975738,0.00006153352,0.006357524,0.01650696,0.0003359083,0.0002683784,0.00002753412,0.000002912877,0.0007011833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985691,0.0001568104,0.0007631985,0.0002783425,0.0001069426,0.00001674428,0.000002018966,0.000006899912,0.00009999902],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02283098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2795015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02260668005029987,"score_gpt":0.3514603778315311,"score_spread":0.3288536977812312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}