{"id":"W2770950817","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1","title":"Ratcheting ambition to limit warming to 1.5 °C – trade-offs between emission reductions and carbon dioxide removal","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Research Letters","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Environmental science; Term (time); Offset (computer science); Global warming; Limit (mathematics); Climate change; Natural resource economics; Carbon dioxide; Reduction (mathematics); Climate change mitigation; Environmental economics; Computer science; Economics; Ecology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001030564,0.0001456966,0.0002312235,0.0003956954,0.0003845552,0.00007296885,0.000173544,0.00007883504,0.0001289945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001409514,0.0001875846,0.00005035825,0.0001944422,0.0001924953,0.0001595514,0.0002714788,0.0002626232,0.0005052619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005383864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004492598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003729667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002088584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983142,0.0000424332,0.0003760411,0.0005689506,0.00008592791,0.0006124524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991876,0.00009299765,0.00006909935,0.0002853428,0.000002440488,0.0003625282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002148302,0.0002113955,0.3073114,0.00007781482,0.0001245576,0.0000466549,0.01884884,0.0000719294,0.640343,0.000747568,0.01243407,0.01956785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001515537,0.001086039,0.5752088,0.0002358578,0.00002194031,0.00008202006,0.004760435,0.0008432038,0.1333872,0.003155907,0.2780381,0.001664948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9692896,0.00008015074,0.0001011758,0.02836403,0.0001464194,0.0003190163,0.000113206,0.00002205344,0.001564332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963102,0.0001119808,0.0008035908,0.001355586,0.0009549733,0.00004041383,0.0000274983,0.00003933812,0.0003563765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5069558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7649477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.123612219219438,"score_gpt":0.3100714527084426,"score_spread":0.1864592334890046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}