{"id":"W2770950817","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1","title":"Ratcheting ambition to limit warming to 1.5 °C – trade-offs between emission reductions and carbon dioxide removal","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Research Letters","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Environmental science; Term (time); Offset (computer science); Global warming; Limit (mathematics); Climate change; Natural resource economics; Carbon dioxide; Reduction (mathematics); Climate change mitigation; Environmental economics; Computer science; Economics; Ecology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002398535,0.000547196,0.0004014627,0.0003572803,0.0004846139,0.00187707,0.00113706,0.001149358,0.006563049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005626868,0.000275713,0.001102415,0.0003547168,0.0007379861,0.001901077,0.001518486,0.001505161,0.0004866962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001404901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001070005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008082892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009634644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986418,0.0007547684,0.00003399366,0.0001688149,0.0001881048,0.0002124626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980583,0.001166312,0.0001788042,0.0002312672,0.0002440067,0.0001213138],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005687656,0.000157266,0.009616745,0.0003490181,0.0001982947,0.0005892951,0.0003594932,0.8857554,0.009008956,0.06130213,0.005184519,0.02691027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001691833,0.001785415,0.0186231,0.0003394778,0.0002686013,0.0003084002,0.002521913,0.7916561,0.01864162,0.1209329,0.04445161,0.0003016736],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8518156,0.0006868793,0.04215046,0.005306162,0.0003861806,0.0001465829,0.0008705573,0.0003847677,0.09825275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954576,0.00009899909,0.002953536,0.0001522403,0.0000102045,0.00003328538,0.00009853117,0.00003365584,0.001162053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008082892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02195555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.123612219219438,"score_gpt":0.3100714527084426,"score_spread":0.1864592334890046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}