{"id":"W2771496933","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.002","title":"Timber market actors' values on forest legislation: A case study from Colombia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development","keywords":"Legislation; Forest management; Business; Variety (cybernetics); Forest ecology; Government (linguistics); Environmental resource management; Transparency (behavior); Deforestation (computer science); Poverty; Forest product; Forestry; Geography; Economics; Ecosystem; Ecology; Political science; Economic growth","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009212783,0.0003072786,0.0003780149,0.001288643,0.006040037,0.004165649,0.0007070498,0.001825572,0.007102357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00306243,0.0001952945,0.0002038746,0.001989058,0.002213303,0.001487532,0.00171687,0.001357261,0.0002188096],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01260893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004146143,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5725472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990563,0.0002922298,0.00002629632,0.00009509705,0.0001349321,0.0003950895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980415,0.001323008,0.0001902316,0.00006306284,0.0002210871,0.0001611305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009185015,0.001776072,0.2464748,0.001583199,0.0001464029,0.03095049,0.350965,0.005870104,0.006120211,0.1846937,0.01955604,0.1509455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001156962,0.0001894133,0.2312042,0.0006677585,0.0001689937,0.001838272,0.6150312,0.003955397,0.001420937,0.005930947,0.1393482,0.0001290918],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9138435,0.0007690685,0.0003390027,0.001156108,0.00001422551,0.00006902447,0.0001783892,0.00001145055,0.08361924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952198,0.0003544501,0.0002235246,0.00008167994,0.000003730228,0.00001922489,0.00007261772,0.00000611445,0.004018862],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.34334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6826831,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02156682428687063,"score_gpt":0.2669197183203632,"score_spread":0.2453528940334925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}