{"id":"W2771556745","doi":"10.1002/mp.12716","title":"Monte Carlo study of ionization chamber magnetic field correction factors as a function of angle and beam quality","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Physics","topic":"Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Ionization chamber; Monte Carlo method; Laser beam quality; Physics; Quality (philosophy); Dosimetry; Magnetic field; Computational physics; Beam (structure); Ionization; Optics; Nuclear physics; Medical physics; Nuclear medicine; Medicine; Ion; Laser beams; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001770009,0.000408982,0.0003490504,0.0004128318,0.0003158642,0.0005158414,0.0004671062,0.000314233,0.0007404153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007423041,0.0005118662,0.0004140026,0.0006090979,0.0002336644,0.0003594547,0.0002114047,0.0003051132,0.0001727874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001333437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006818095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006208694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004628318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993285,0.0002276827,0.00002549917,0.00009678611,0.0002714767,0.00005003143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949653,0.003158688,0.0007042603,0.000306384,0.0008006046,0.00006476837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004958881,0.00004274588,0.01565447,0.00007232396,0.00008170945,0.00006475497,0.00006050985,0.9516505,0.01398787,0.001468864,0.0002701157,0.01615031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005666279,0.0001659671,0.007841046,0.00001476202,0.00004950381,0.00008455583,0.0000132261,0.9685384,0.02209941,0.0002763,0.0008243526,0.00003580657],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8180409,0.0009389179,0.1722342,0.0001702371,0.00002551219,0.0001381864,0.0003001707,0.001104522,0.007047297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746051,0.0001104927,0.02442756,0.0000284632,0.000003141125,0.00004186949,0.0001395647,0.0001340138,0.000509829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006208694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01234508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01565272255449608,"score_gpt":0.3113841111023353,"score_spread":0.2957313885478392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}