{"id":"W2771968043","doi":"10.1109/esem.2017.66","title":"Beyond Boxes and Lines: Creating and Empirically Evaluating Alternative Visualizations for Requirements Conceptual Models","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Diagrammatic reasoning; Visualization; Modeling language; Notation; Semantics (computer science); Domain (mathematical analysis); Domain model; Conceptual model; Domain-specific language; Software engineering; Human–computer interaction; Data science; Programming language; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Software; Domain knowledge; Database; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08870471,0.001856943,0.000952905,0.004534443,0.001700773,0.00717839,0.003418294,0.00335535,0.004720766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4319136,0.001141307,0.001592591,0.003555606,0.004079022,0.01390803,0.007484257,0.004008709,0.0005718629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003843935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002052833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002625251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004899141,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9167396,0.06985166,0.005549142,0.002600978,0.004616211,0.0006423178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2988824,0.6461046,0.01360428,0.02660198,0.01298041,0.001826448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009871775,0.01121171,0.0881613,0.01095225,0.00102518,0.001066965,0.1291724,0.1175779,0.01409672,0.131788,0.0122736,0.4728023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00556634,0.01484691,0.05175714,0.006827252,0.001491119,0.0007764019,0.05682093,0.6660914,0.02385967,0.1322682,0.03867459,0.001020048],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7751116,0.001112365,0.2036071,0.001947656,0.0001712838,0.005665599,0.001085684,0.001751354,0.009547314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.649613,0.0003163433,0.3439009,0.0002419922,0.00003036723,0.004267196,0.0009724777,0.0002161656,0.0004414908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08870471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4691209,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1773107972064184,"score_gpt":0.4443591190511401,"score_spread":0.2670483218447216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}